Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Kiribati |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KIRIBATI
LAND JURISDICTION
HELD AT BETIO
REPUBLIC OF KIRIBATI
High Court Land Appeal 41 of 2003
Between:
NEI KAKAI TEENGA
Appellant
And:
NEI RARA TEENGA
Respondent
For the Appellant: Mr Banuera Berina
For the Respondent: Mr Aomoro Amten
Date of Hearing: 21 July 2004
JUDGMENT
(Ex Tempore)
Teenga was married twice and had daughters by each wife: he had no sons. The appellant is the eldest daughter by the first marriage. The respondent is the eldest daughter by the second marriage.
Mr Berina has directed our attention to s.11 of the Native Lands Code and in particular to the sentence in s.11(ii), “If there are no sons then the share of the eldest daughter will exceed that of her sisters”.
The Single Magistrate in her judgment does not mention s.11 and this leads us to believe that she did not consider it. We believe the whole of s.11 to be relevant to the distribution and that being so think there should be another hearing.
The appeal is allowed, the decision of the Single Magistrate quashed and the case returned to the Magistrate’s Court for rehearing in accordance with these reasons.
The Hon Robin Millhouse QC
Chief Justice
Betero Kaitangare
Magistrate
Raratu Ieita
Magistrate
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ki/cases/KIHC/2004/178.html