PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Traditional Rights Court of the Marshall Islands

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Traditional Rights Court of the Marshall Islands >> 2005 >> [2005] MHTRC 1

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Lokboj v Rowa [2005] MHTRC 1; Civil Action 2003-214 (14 April 2005)

IN THE TRADITIONAL RIGHTS COURTS
REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS


CIVIL ACTION NO: 2003-214


JULIE LOKBOJ AND ELSIE LOKKON
Plaintiff


vs


LANE ROWA AND IRUMNE BONDRIK
Defendants


OPINION IN ANSWER


High Court Civil Action No.2003-214 was initially heard before the High Court on January 23rd, 2004, at 2:45 in the afternoon. However, due to some problem with council and parties, this matter was continued to Monday, February 9th, 2004.


The members of the Traditional Rights Court panel have reviewed all the testimonies given by the witnesses for both parties, as recorded in the Transcript of the Proceedings before Associate Justice Richard G. Hickson.


This Court (TRC) find and recognized this case to be a very good and interesting one. It is good because it is the first one that has ever presented to this Court, the question of whether or not a female can hold title. It is interesting in that it involves the gift from Our Creator that we call kobo. When we say jined-ilo-kobo, what are we talking about? We are talking about the warmth that the chicks feel every time their mother hen gathers them within her wings and hugs them close to her bosom to keep them warm and safe. It is the same warmth that children feel when their mother hugs them to her breast. They feel such a warmth-of-love from their mother that knows no bound. We can say that our mothers are also our mothers in our jeban bwij (head lineage). That is the custom.


This case, High Court Civil Action No.2003-214 was referred to the Traditional Rights Court for resolution under the custom, and on March 8th through the 11th, 2005, it was heard jointly with High Court in the Uliga Courthouse, Majuro Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands. The members of the panel were Acting Chief Judge Berson Joseph, Pro Temp Associate Judge Botlang Loeak and Pro Temp Associate Judge Alee Term.


This case was referred to this court of custom to thoroughly review and resolve, solely on the basis of the custom and the arrangements made since the beginning of time to the present day by our forefathers and iroijs, the dispute between the parties of who is the right and proper person to hold the alab and dri jerbal titles on the following wetos: Muinluial, Monjelar, Lodrenaj, Taukan, Aronuij, Lau, Akadrikien, Kamarre, Oble, and Nukne in Kwajalein Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands.


The main issue in this case is that of the females and their right to hold the alab and dri-jerbal title. This Court of custom is going to give an opinion on this issue that is based solely on the custom. This Court recognizes very much the importance of the custom and its role in determining what is fair and just to the parties without any surprise and without any bias.


I. THE CUSTOM OF THE MARSHALLESE PEOPLE:


1. Manmaronron: This term applies to a bwij, and it is the females in bwij who approves it. A male on his own cannot claim it and say he is the manmaronron if he doesn't have his older sisters approval. It is very obvious that this is the case here in this present dispute. According to our custom, no iroij has the right to appoint someone to be a manmaronron for someone else. This is also true for our mothers and fathers. This is at the sole discretion of a male's older sister. As examples, Nelu Watak is not the manmaronron for Leroij Neimata Kabua and Bwillej Jibaj is not the manmaronron for Likwor Litokwa. The important question here is, who appointed Lane Rowa to be the manmaronron for Julie Lokboj? Lane Rowa can only, without a doubt, be the manmaronron for his biological older sister, Mrs. Anjo Joel. Other examples of the custom of manmaronron are the deceased Iroijlaplap Kabua Kabua and Hamilton Bani. Kabua Kabua was a manmaronron under the approval from his older sister. Hamilton Bani became an alab in exactly the same way. His older sisters recognized him and allowed him to be the alab.


2. Menmenbwij (genealogy chart): The genealogy chart dictates the right and proper person to hold both the alab and dri-jerbal right on a piece of land or weto, and the custom dictates that the rights pass down horizontally. The genealogy chart shows us the correct devolution of each of the rights on our lands, such as Plaintiff's Exhibit No. A does. Plaintiff's Exhibit No. A is the genealogy chart for the four (4) lineages involved in this case. (Please see).


II. THE DISPUTE:


1.Question No. 1 as presented: As between Julie Lokboj and Lane Rowa, who is the proper person to hold the alab right on these wetos, Akadrikien, Kamarre, Lau, Lodrenaj, Muinluial, Tuakan, and Monjelar in Roi-Namur, and Nukne Island in Kwajalein Atoll, and why?


Opinion in Answer to Question No. 1 as Presented: Julie Lokboj.


Brief Summary of Reasoning on which the Opinion is Based: This Court recognizes Julie Lokboj without any bias because she is from the oldest of the four (4) lineages, as shown in Plaintiff's Exhibit No. A. She is the right and proper person to succeed Isael Lokkon, the last alab on the lands in dispute here. There is nothing under our custom preventing a female from becoming an alab or dri-jerbal on their own lands. When Iroij Lojelan Kabua made his Kalimur of December 19, 1979, he gave the alab right on Aronuij Weto and Oble Island to Kinbar Anej, a female. [Please see Defendant's Exhibit D-1].


Our custom is good. It tells us that regardless of whether an alab is still in good mental health or has become senile, the alab as absolutely no right at all to appoint who the successor in interest will be without the knowledge and understanding of the members of the older lineages. Therefore, the arrangement by Isael Lokkon that he made by himself to appoint Lane Rowa as his successor wasn't proper under our custom. Accordingly, this Court of custom does not recognize the right given to Lane Rowa because it's not proper.


This Court of custom also heard the testimony and stories told by Mrs. Anjo Joel. They were such well-told and interesting stories, however, this Court also recognized that they're all hearsay.


This Court also recognized that Lane Rowa doesn't really know or understand about lineages for if he did then he would really know how to respect his older sister who is really the jeban bwij (lineage head) for their lineages.


2. Question No. 2 as Presented: Who is the proper person as between Julie Lokboj and Irumne Bondrik to hold the alab right on Aronuij Weto in Roi-Namur and Oble Island, Kwajalein Atoll?


Opinion in Answer to Question No. 2 as Presented: Irumne Bondrik.


Brief Summary of Reasoning on which the Opinion is Based:


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/mh/cases/MHTRC/2005/1.html