PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Reports of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Reports of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands >> 1963 >> [1963] TTLawRp 4

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Kanser v Pitor [1963] TTLawRp 4; 2 TTR 481 (18 November 1963)

TRIAL DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT


TRUK DISTRICT


Civil Action No. 173


KANSER

Plaintiff


v


PITOR, ERNA, and PIO

Defendants


Civil Action No. 172


KANSER

Plaintiff


v


ENITA TIKITIK, and PIO

Defendants


November 18, 1963

Actions for determination of title to land on Fefan Island, in which plaintiff claims land on basis of lineage ownership prior to civil war of 1877. The Trial Division of the High Court, Chief Justice E. P. Furber, held that plaintiff is barred from bringing action as present courts will not correct alleged wrongs occurring during former administration where appeal to authorities of that time was available; doctrine of laches estops plaintiff, and doctrine of lost grant creates strong presumption of ownership in defendants which has not been rebutted.

1. Former Administrations-Taking of Private Property by Japanese Government-Limitations

Fear of Japanese authorities is not legal excuse for failure to bring action under former administration since Japanese courts were open to land disputes.

2. Equity-Laches

Court will not reach into distant past to correct injustices which may have existed.

3. Contracts-Voidable Contracts-Undue Influence

Where out of respect, fear or awe of some traditional leader but without threat of unlawful force, one is persuaded to make agreement and receives benefit of agreement, party to agreement cannot be relieved of consequences of it.

4. Real Property-Subsequent Holders

Heirs and transferees take land subject to agreements and admissions against interest properly made by their predecessors in interest under laws and customs as they then stood.

5. Former Administrations-Applicable Law

Whether any action was legally right or wrong should be decided according to law at time action was taken.

6. Former Administrations-Redress of Prior Wrongs- Exception to Applicable Doctrine

Present administration is not required as matter of right to correct such wrongs as former administration may have done, except in cases where wrong occurred so near time of change of administration that there was no opportunity for it to be corrected through courts or agencies of former administration.

7. Trust Territory-Land Law

Law concerning ownership, use, inheritance and transfer of land in effect on December I, 1941, remains in full force and effect except insofar as it is changed by express written enactment. (T.T.C., Sec. 24)

8. Equity-Laches


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/other/TTLawRp/1963/4.html