Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback Papua New Guinea Law Reports

State v Wapuri [1994] PGLawRp 615; [1994] PNGLR 271 (26 April 1994)

PNG Law Reports 1994

[1994] PNGLR 271 - State v Isaac Wapuri�

[1994] PNGLR 271

N1212

PAPUA NEW GUINEA

[NATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]

THE STATE

V

ISAAC WAPURI

Waigani

Kapi DCJ

16 February 1994

24-25 February 1994

26 April 1994

CRIMINAL LAW - Sentence - Grievous bodily harm - Compensation under Criminal Law (Compensation) Act 1991 - Custom of victim's clan taken into account.

Facts

The accused pleaded guilty to a charge of grievous bodily harm. He came before the Court for sentencing and determination of the possibility of compensation under the Criminal Law (Compensation) Act 1991. The accused had assaulted his cousin's wife with a handbrake cable from a motor vehicle. Medical evidence established that the victim suffered a permanent injury of 90% loss of vision of the left eye.

Held

N1>1.������ The accused should pay compensation to the victim, having regard to the custom of the people of Kapantais village of Angilan clan, Laiagam, Enga Province.

N1>2.������ The compensation payable was K500 in cash and five pigs, valued at about K800, payable to the victim within one month; in default, two months imprisonment.

Counsel

P Mogis, for The State.

E Kamburi, for the accused.

26 April 1994

KAPI DCJ:� The accused pleaded guilty to a charge of grievous bodily harm contrary to s 319 of the Criminal Code.

At the time of the offence, the accused was living with his cousin and his wife. Prior to the commission of this offence, accused's cousin's wife, the victim in this case, made advances towards him for sexual intercourse. The accused refused to have sexual intercourse. On 1 September 1993, when the accused returned to the house from work, he found all his clothes were thrown all over the place. The accused believed that this was done by the victim because he had refused to have sexual intercourse with her. This belief was not contested by the State. The disruption of his clothing angered the accused, and he obtained a cable of a handbrake of a motor vehicle and assaulted the victim across the face with it. This resulted in injuries - a muscular tear - in the left eye. Dr Peter Korombo, in a medical report dated 30 September 1993, concluded the injury to the left eye "amounts to 90% of visual loss of the left eye. This is a permanent change and there is nothing further that can be done to improve the vision."

Having regard to the facts of this case and all the factors in favour of the accused, I would impose a sentence of 18 months in hard labour. He has spent a total of five months waiting for this trial. This will be taken as part of the 18 months term. In view of the background to this case, I consider that this is sufficient punishment, and I would suspend the rest of the sentence and place the accused on good behaviour bond for a period of 12 months.

In addition to this punishment, I considered the possibility of compensation, as directed by Criminal Law (Compensation) Act 1991. I called for a means assessment report pursuant to s 4 of the Act and the factors for consideration under s 3. I have received these reports, including the relevant custom regarding compensation. The Chief Probation Officer recommended that I should order compensation, as the accused is capable of paying it.

Counsel for the accused obtained the custom of the people of Kapantais village of Tangilan clan, Laiagam, in Enga Province. The evidence of custom relating to compensation was obtained from the following persons: David Lambu, Jack Wialu, John Waip, William Kili, Dick Poro, Iso Norm, Beno Tambukin, and Jack Kili. The evidence of custom relating to compensation is as follows. Compensation is paid for both the death of a person and injuries caused to a person. It is not necessary to deal with compensation for death. Compensation for injuries may be catagorised as follows:

N2>1.������ Common assault - one medium pig and K10.

N2>2.������ Where injury results in permanent injury - five to six pigs and K300 - K600.

Counsel obtained recent compensation payments for permanent injuries. In December 1993, a person who suffered a fractured jaw and has difficulty in eating received a compensation of three pigs and K200 in cash.

In January 1994, a person who suffered a fractured skull received one pig and K87 in cash.

Having referred to the injury received, the report of the Chief Probation Officer, and custom relating to compensation for injuries, I order that compensation be paid as follows:

N2>(1)����� K500 in cash; and

N2>(2)����� five pigs, valued at about K800.

I direct that these payments be made to the victim, and the payments to be made within one month. If there is default in payment, the accused will spend two months in prison in accordance with the Schedule in Criminal Law (Compensation) Act 1991.

Lawyer for the State: Public Prosecutor.

Lawyer for the accused: Public Solicitor.