PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Solomon Islands

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Solomon Islands >> 1999 >> [1999] SBHC 9

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Regina v Tebounapa [1999] SBHC 9; HC-CRC 033 of 1997 (10 February 1999)

HIGH COURT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS

Criminal Case No. 33 of 1997

REGINA

lass="MsoNormal" align="cen="center" style="text-align: center; margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1">

v

WILLIAM TEBOUNAPA

In the High Court of So Islands

Before: FRANK KABUI, J

Criminal Case No. 33 of 1997

Hearing: 2nd

Sentence: 10th February 1999

Andrew Nori for the Ac

DPP for the Crown

SENTENCE

as class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> (Frank Kabui J): Indecent assault is a serious offence. It carries the maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment. It is a form of assault against a woman or girl without her consent being indecent in nature. Being indecent means offending against accepted standards of decency or morality in society. Playing with a woman�s private parts without her consent is an indecent assault of her body and her modesty. It is against the accepted standards of decency in Solomon Islands. It is an immoral act punishable by law.

Rape is also an offence against females of all races. It is a more serious offence than indecent assault. It carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. Rape is of all sorts. One sort involves sexual intercourse without the consent of the female concerned by using force, threat or intimidation of any kind or by fear of bodily harm. The other sort involves sexual intercourse with a married woman by personation of her husband, that is pretending to be her husband.

p class="Mss="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> The last sort involves sexual intercourse by means of making frepresentations as to the the nature of the act. You were convicted of the last sort. You used no force to get consent. You were able to commit indecent assault and rape because you told the Complainants you would treat them for their belly aches. They trusted you. In the case of Catherine Tura, her husband trusted you also. You kept your word but you went beyond normal treatment and committed two offences against them and the state. That is a breach of trust that they had in you. You knew in your heart and mind that you were doing wrong. You knew you were lying to them when you went beyond the limits of normal treatment. You knew what you were saying to Catherine Tura that sexual intercourse with you would cure her belly ache was a lie. That was evil of you. You took advantage of the two women and damage their reputation in the community, apart from damaging your own as a custom doctor. You are not to be trusted any more.

I have taken into account the fact that the Complainantsadults. They should have reve resisted you. They are to be somewhat blamed also for what happened to them. However trust and belief are probably their fault. You yourself imparted into them the feeling of trust and belief in you as a custom doctor. You were the cause of it all. You were a confidence trickster.

I have also tanto account all that is said in your favour by your lawyer. It is true that you did not advertise yourself as a custom doctor. This is normal in villages throughout the Solomon Islands. Always, custom doctors are known by word of mouth passed from one person to another. So the word gets around and the custom doctors get visitors from time to time. This is, I believe, also true in your case. You were however free to turn down the two Complainants who called on you for help. You did not. As a matter of fact, you said it was good that they came to you for help. You accepted them. They believed you. Also, you should not have treated them in a small room where you were by yourself with them alone. Your wife should have been in that small room with you or else your wife should be the one doing the pressing (massaging) since the Complainants are females. You were foolish to be alone with them. You had by your own choice placed yourself in a situation where you gave in to temptation. It was almost inevitable in the way you set yourself up in your small room. It may however be wrong for women to seek custom medicine treatment in the Solomon Islands outside of medical services provided by the Government, churches and private doctors. The choice however would seem to remain by practice in Solomon Islands in the users of the various medical services. It is not uncommon in Solomon Islands for persons to consult custom doctors prior to seeing a qualified nurse or doctor or after having received medical treatment they have still not been cured of their illnesses. Such behaviour is simply human nature. One cannot really blame a female patient for having made a wrong choice who consults a qualified male doctor who through trickery of some sort commits rape upon that female patient. That male doctor cannot really say that his patient comes to him voluntarily or has made the wrong choice. That is not the point. The point is that rape must not be committed upon persons who seek treatment of whatever nature and from whomsoever who agrees to treat them for their troubles.

I have further taken i account the fact that you have a family and that you have no previous co convictions. That must however be weighed against the gravity of the offences you committed. The offences you committed are serious offences.

They would call for custodial sentence in your case. Women and the community aity at large would abhor your conduct. All women must be protected against persons like you.

The sentence of this court that you be imprisoned for 12 months for count 1 and 6 yea6 years for count 3. These are to run concurrently.

Dated this 10th day of February 1999

F.O. Kabui
Judge


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/sb/cases/SBHC/1999/9.html