PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Court of Appeal of Vanuatu

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Court of Appeal of Vanuatu >> 2021 >> [2021] VUCA 65

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Tabi v Bule [2021] VUCA 65; Civil Appeal 2285 of 2021 (17 September 2021)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF Civil Appeal

THE REPUBLIC OF VANUATU Case No. 21/2285 CIVA/COA

(Civil Jurisdiction)


BETWEEN: August Tabi and Steward Bule

Appellants

AND: Ezekiel Bule

Respondent


Date: 17 September 2021

By: Justice G.A. Andrée Wiltens

Counsel: Mr Jim N. Vohor for the Appellant

No appearance for the Respondent


Decision


__________________________________________________________________________________


  1. The appellants applied for leave to appeal out of time. The original decision being appealed was published on 14 May 2021. The Notice and Grounds of appeal was filed on 14 July 2021 – 14 months after the decision.
  2. The appeal grounds refer to an error of fact.
  3. One difficulty the appellants face is that the trial proceed on the basis of no steps having been taken by the appellants and the Court having only the evidence of the Respondent and his witnesses to consider. It is difficult to see how an error of fact can be maintained in these circumstances.
  4. The delay in dealing with the appeal is said to be shortage of funds. That does not explain why the Notice could not have been filed on a pro forma basis and time sought to gather together the necessary funds to argue the appeal.
  5. I accordingly neither accept the reasons for the delay as being satisfactory, nor do I consider there any prospects of a successful appeal. Leave is therefore declined to file the appeal out of time.
  6. Further, the appellants sought a staying of execution pending the outcome of the appeal.
  7. The difficulty with this contention is the delay. The judgment of 14 May 2020 ordered the appellants to vacate certain land within 21 days of service of the judgment.
  8. The application for stay is simply far too late. I decline this application.
  9. The appellants can, if they wish, pursue both aspects further with the Court of Appeal.

Dated at Luganville, this 17 day of September 2021

BY THE COURT


.................................................

Justice G.A. Andrée Wiltens



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/vu/cases/VUCA/2021/65.html