PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Samoa

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Samoa >> 2016 >> [2016] WSSC 105

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Police v Lasalo [2016] WSSC 105 (8 July 2016)

SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v Lasalo [2016] WSSC 105


Case name:
Police v Lasalo


Citation:


Decision date:
8 July 2016


Parties:
POLICE and SAKARIA LASALO male of Nofoalii (defendant)


Hearing date(s):
23 May 2016


File number(s):



Jurisdiction:
Criminal


Place of delivery:
Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu


Judge(s):
JUSTICE VAAI


On appeal from:



Order:
Serve 1 year and 8 months imprisonment.


Representation:
L Sio for prosecution

C Vaai for defendant
Catchwords:
Sexual connection – defended hearing – found guilty – victim impact report – imprisonment term


Words and phrases:



Legislation cited:



Cases cited:



Summary of decision:


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
HELD AT MULINUU


S3672/2015, S3737/2015


BETWEEN:

POLICE
Prosecution


AND:


SAKARIA LASALO male of Nofoalii
Defendant


Counsel:
L Sio for prosecution
C Vaai for defendant


Sentence: 8 July 2016


S E N T E N C E

  1. Defendant after a defended hearing, you were found guilty by this Court of having sexual connection with a girl aged 14.
  2. There is no need for me to go through the facts again accept to say that this young girl was walking home when you approached her and both of you went to the bushes by the dirt road on the day in question.
  3. The girl was only 14 and you were 40 at the time, age difference of 26 years. You obviously took advantage of this victim walking by herself, for some distance, and through the defendant’s plantation. You led her away from the road into the bushes. She was unable to defend herself through your superior strength and size. The Court has before it the victim impact report and inevitably the victim was obviously impacted both physically and emotionally.
  4. In considering the appropriate sentence, the Court must take into account the purpose of the law to protect young girls.
  5. The sentence must express condemnation by the community and the need to deter people like yourself and other like-minded men.
  6. In the circumstance I consider 2 years as the appropriate starting point for sentence. For your early guilty plea I will deduct 6 months. For your previous good record and genuine remorse I will deduct another 4 months. You will serve 1 year and 2 months imprisonment; any time spent in custody will be deducted.
  7. I have incorrectly deducted 6 months for your guilty plea. You were found guilty and the 6 months deduction is reversed. You will serve 1 year and 8 months imprisonment.

JUSTICE VAAI


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2016/105.html