PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Samoa

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Samoa >> 2016 >> [2016] WSSC 80

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Police v Iosefa [2016] WSSC 80 (16 May 2016)

SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v Iosefa [2016] WSSC 80


Case name:
Police v Iosefa


Citation:


Decision date:
16 May 2016


Parties:
POLICE v JORDAN LEMALU IOSEFA male of Lalovaea and Tafaigata


Hearing date(s):
16 May 2016


File number(s):
S2911/15, S2913/15


Jurisdiction:
CRIMINAL


Place of delivery:
In the Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu


Judge(s):
JUSTICE MATA TUATAGALOA


On appeal from:



Order:
Convicted and sentenced to 16 months’ imprisonment. Less time in custody.


Representation:
L Sio for Prosecution
Defendant in Person


Catchwords:
Burglary – theft – hotel premises – custodial sentence – previous offending of similar nature –


Words and phrases:



Legislation cited:



Cases cited:



Summary of decision:

SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA


HELD AT MULINUU


BETWEEN:


P O L I C E
Prosecution


AND:


JORDAN LEMALU IOSEFA, male of Lalovaea and Tafaigata
Defendant


Counsel:
L Sio for Prosecution
Defendant in Person


Sentence: 16 May 2016


SENTENCING OF JUSTICE TUATAGALOA

  1. The accused appears for sentence on charges of burglary and theft committed on 24 July 2015 at Millenia Hotel.
  2. The charge of burglary carries a maximum of 10 years’ imprisonment while the charge of theft is maximum 7 years’ imprisonment.
  3. The summary of facts by the prosecution was read out and the accused has confirmed it which basically is:
  4. The total value of the said properties is $1,416.00.
  5. The accused has previous convictions of similar offending. The way the accused carried out this offending showed his disregard if he was caught. It also shows that he is a danger to society and people’s valuables and properties are no longer secure with people like him around.
  6. The fact that he stole from a guestroom in Millenia Hotel which was occupied by visitors to the country will no doubt reflect on the tourism market but especially the hotel involved because of such people like the accused.
  7. The accused total disregard of the law is that he committed this offending whilst under a two year supervision term.
  8. A custodial sentence is most appropriate. The only thing in the accused favor is his early plea. I will take the burglary charge as the leading offence and impose a two year starting point; less 1/3 discount for early pleas – which is 8 months. This leaves 16 months’ imprisonment.
  9. For the offence of theft I impose 6 months’ imprisonment.
  10. The sentences are to be concurrent, less time in custody.

JUSTICE TUATAGALOA


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2016/80.html