PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Supreme Court of Samoa

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of Samoa >> 2017 >> [2017] WSSC 25

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Police v Epa [2017] WSSC 25 (13 April 2017)

SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
Police v Epa [2017] WSSC 25


Case name:
Police v Epa


Citation:


Decision date:
13 April 2017


Parties:
POLICE v MALO EPA male of Alamagoto and Vaimoso.


Hearing date(s):
19/12/2016, 13/3/2017, 16/3/2017, 11/4/2017


File number(s):
S3006/16


Jurisdiction:
Criminal


Place of delivery:
Supreme Court of Samoa, Mulinuu


Judge(s):
Chief Justice Sapolu


On appeal from:



Order:
- Convicted and sentenced to 6 months supervision.


Representation:
O Tagaloa for prosecution
Accused in person


Catchwords:
Alcohol and Drugs Court – clinician – possession of narcotics – Toe Afua Se Taeao psycho-education Alcohol and Drugs Programme – programme facilitator


Words and phrases:



Legislation cited:


Cases cited:



Summary of decision:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SAMOA
HELD AT MULINUU


File Number: S3006/16


BETWEEN


P O L I C E


Prosecution


A N D


MALO EPA male of Alamagoto and Vaimoso


Accused


Counsel:
O Tagaloa for prosecution
Accused in person


Sentence: 13 April 2017


S EN T E N C E

  1. The accused Malo Epa, a 31 year old male of Alamagoto and Vaimoso, appears for sentence on one charge of possession of narcotics, namely, a small marijuana branch weighing 0.2 grams, contrary to s.7 of Narcotics Act 1967, which carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment under s.18. To the charge, he pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity.
  2. The prosecution’s summary of facts which was confirmed by the accused shows that on 10 December 2016 the police stopped the accused’s taxi as the accused was suspected of being under the influence of alcohol. The accused was then taken to Apia police station where his taxi was searched by the police. A small marijuana branch was found behind the steering wheel above the meter panel. The accused admitted the marijuana branch was for his own use.
  3. After the accused entered his guilty plea to the charge he was referred to the Alcohol and Drugs Court (ADC) clinician for an assessment and to report back to this Court. The report from the ADC clinician recommended that the accused be referred to the six week Toe Afua Se Taeao Fou psycho-education Alcohol and Drugs Programme. The accused has attended and completed this programme and has been issued with a certificate of due completion. The report from the programme facilitator shows that the programme has been useful to the accused who reported to have abstained from alcohol and marijuana consumption for two months.
  4. In the circumstances, I have decided that a term of supervision will be beneficial for the accused. He is therefore convicted and sentenced to 6 months supervision.

CHIEF JUSTICE


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/ws/cases/WSSC/2017/25.html